<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crossing Boundaries: 2005 IA Summit Wrapup: Overview and Pre-Sessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxesandarrows.com/crossing-boundaries-2005-ia-summit-wrapup-overview-and-pre-sessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/crossing-boundaries-2005-ia-summit-wrapup-overview-and-pre-sessions/</link>
	<description>Boxes and Arrows is devoted to the practice, innovation, and discussion of design; including graphic design, interaction design, information architecture and the design of business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Gjertin Urkegjerde Halland</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/crossing-boundaries-2005-ia-summit-wrapup-overview-and-pre-sessions/#comment-9897</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Gjertin Urkegjerde Halland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/crossing-boundaries-2005-ia-summit-wrapup-overview-and-pre-sessions/#comment-9897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note about &quot;disneyfication&quot; of taxonomies: I believe the reference was made to how Disney usually lifts a local fairy tale (like the hunchback or pochahontas) and cleans away all the &quot;dangerous&quot; cultural connotations to fit it to a global market without offending anyone. A similar case can be made against a taxonomy crafted to fit in to any cultural context; we might loose something vital on the way there. But the main point I was trying to make was not necessarily about american cultural &quot;propaganda&quot;, but one about  what we might loose on the way from a locally rooted taxonomy (or fairy tale) to a global one-size-fits-all taxonomy (or the Disney-version of that fairy tale).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note about &#8220;disneyfication&#8221; of taxonomies: I believe the reference was made to how Disney usually lifts a local fairy tale (like the hunchback or pochahontas) and cleans away all the &#8220;dangerous&#8221; cultural connotations to fit it to a global market without offending anyone. A similar case can be made against a taxonomy crafted to fit in to any cultural context; we might loose something vital on the way there. But the main point I was trying to make was not necessarily about american cultural &#8220;propaganda&#8221;, but one about  what we might loose on the way from a locally rooted taxonomy (or fairy tale) to a global one-size-fits-all taxonomy (or the Disney-version of that fairy tale).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
