Comments on: Re-architecting PeopleSoft.com from the bottom-up http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/ Boxes and Arrows is devoted to the practice, innovation, and discussion of design; including graphic design, interaction design, information architecture and the design of business. Mon, 20 May 2013 13:09:05 +0000 hourly 1 By: christina http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-8621 christina Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-8621 fixed. And please us contact us forms to report bugs, they get fixed faster that way! Thanks for watching our backs!

]]> By: ML http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-8622 ML Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-8622 I really enjoyed the case study and I’ve been able to share the example to colleagues about how effective IA can be to an enterprise’s business. Any chance you can share the 12 attributes for describing the pages?

TIA,
Lisa

]]> By: Micah http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5312 Micah Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5312 This damned article is asking me for an ID and PW to see the pictures. What the hey?!!

]]> By: Colin faulkingham http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5313 Colin faulkingham Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5313 After reading “Re-architecting PeopleSoft.com from the bottom-up” I decided to go take a look at the site. I was a little surprised when I tried to validate a page according to its “DOCTYPE declaration” and found errors. Why bother declaring such things if you have no intention of adhering to it?

It seem that “site designers” tend to look at this as being unimportant! I wonder why?

BTW, I used the W3C validator at:
http://validator.w3.org/

]]> By: monica fernandes http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5314 monica fernandes Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5314 Thank you for sharing this experience, in special, the bottom-up IA. I would like to know more about IA experiences in designing corporate portals.

]]> By: caseyg http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5315 caseyg Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5315 Great article, the address of the page changed since yesterday, I think you’re probably doing some backend changes. Just thought I’d let you know that the images aren’t visible on this page..

Casey

]]> By: mateo http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5316 mateo Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5316 Still no images here, not very “usable”… :)

]]> By: cwodtke http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5317 cwodtke Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://boxesandarrows.com/re-architecting-peoplesoft-com-from-the-bottom-up/#comment-5317 fixed.

]]>