<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight From the Horse&#8217;s Mouth with Tom Wailes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxesandarrows.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth-with-tom-wailes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth-with-tom-wailes/</link>
	<description>Boxes and Arrows is devoted to the practice, innovation, and discussion of design; including graphic design, interaction design, information architecture and the design of business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: shelisrael</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth-with-tom-wailes/#comment-7032</link>
		<dc:creator>shelisrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth-with-tom-wailes/#comment-7032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice job.  Very informative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job.  Very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austingovella</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth-with-tom-wailes/#comment-7033</link>
		<dc:creator>austingovella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth-with-tom-wailes/#comment-7033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree that a lot of traditional documentation is unnecessary, but isn&#039;t that the designers fault, and not the fault of either the process or the traditional document forms?

I&#039;m curious if it&#039;s the documentation that&#039;s bullshit, or if as a culture, designers have adopted a lifestyle of intellectual laziness that lets us focus more on what we like (things that are cool) than on what we do (communicate).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that a lot of traditional documentation is unnecessary, but isn&#8217;t that the designers fault, and not the fault of either the process or the traditional document forms?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious if it&#8217;s the documentation that&#8217;s bullshit, or if as a culture, designers have adopted a lifestyle of intellectual laziness that lets us focus more on what we like (things that are cool) than on what we do (communicate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
