<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boxes and Arrows &#187; Boxes and Arrows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxesandarrows.com/tag/boxes-and-arrows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxesandarrows.com</link>
	<description>Boxes and Arrows is devoted to the practice, innovation, and discussion of design; including graphic design, interaction design, information architecture and the design of business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Not Dead Yet</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/not-dead-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://boxesandarrows.com/not-dead-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina Wodtke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the Editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxes and Arrows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/?p=3458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Boxes and Arrows was founded a little over ten years ago, there was nothing quite like it online. There were peer-reviewed journals, and basic how-to articles. A List Apart was much more concerned with the CSS behind the interface back then, and UX Matters, Johnny Holland and Smashing Magazine were not even a twinkle in...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Sh8mNjeuyV4" frameborder="0" width="640" height="360"></iframe></p>
<p>When <a href="http://boxesandarrows.com/welcome-to-boxes-and-arrows/">Boxes and Arrows was founded</a> a little over ten years ago, there was nothing quite like it online. There were peer-reviewed journals, and basic how-to articles. A List Apart was much more concerned with the CSS behind the interface back then, and UX Matters, Johnny Holland and Smashing Magazine were not even a twinkle in their creators&#8217; eyes. So a bunch of scrappy volunteers gathered together and pushed to get the stories we wanted to read online. We were struggling to figure things out in our day jobs, and we created a place where we could learn from each other. Boxes and Arrows did much better than we could ever have imagined, surviving transitions over four chief editors, thirty-nine editors, and today it holds four-hundred-and-forty-one articles written by three-hundred-and-nine members of the community at large.</p>
<p>But it was always a volunteer organization. It lost money for the first five years of its life, and for the next five barely paid for hosting and conference coverage. This allowed us to podcast the IA Summit for the first time, and paid to have those podcasts transcribed. <a href="http://boxesandarrows.com/ia-summit-09-plenary/">Jesse James Garrett&#8217;s incendiary talk on User Experience</a> is captured because of the passion of those volunteers, and the kind sponsors who made it possible. Our history is written because of the amazing volunteers of Boxes and Arrows. Wireframes were defined and debunked here, Design Patterns explained and complained about, career advice given out and career transitions documented. Boxes and Arrows was the best of us, and we like to think it inspired our many peers who now make it so easy to share inspiration and knowledge.</p>
<p>But as often happens with volunteer efforts, the volunteers&#8217; lives changed. Some people left the field, some people took on jobs that required long hours, and some people made babies. Some people did all three. The people who used to have spare time, didn&#8217;t.  They didn&#8217;t even have time to notice what was happening. And through spam and neglect, the magazine started to wither. And the torch didn&#8217;t get passed. And lacking oxygen, it started to flicker. And now, some say, the light is gone.</p>
<p>But rather than dead, let’s say it is sleeping. Boxes and Arrows is old for an online magazine, and with age comes some advantages. One is SEO: with no new article published, it still gets 5-7K pageviews a day. A bad day for Boxes and Arrows is ten times most blogs&#8217; best day. Which means Boxes and Arrows is still a site with reach. It means it is still a place where a voice, having something important to say, can be amplified. That voice could be yours.</p>
<p>And so, facing retirement or resurrection, we’d like to ask you, reader, what should be the fate of Boxes and Arrows? Is there a new generation of designers out there who wants to take the power of this magazine’s reach and use it to talk about the next generation of user experience design? Will you define it? Will you defend it? Will you debunk it?</p>
<p>If you would like to take over Boxes and Arrows, speak up. We have moved it to a new platform. We have reached out to new writers. We have breathed a little oxygen on to that torch, and the flame begins to catch. We’d like to pass it to you.</p>
<p>If you would like to to volunteer to create the next Boxes and Arrows, please leave a note below. Say what you would like to do, and this magazine is yours.</p>
<p>Again.</p>
<p>As it always was.</p>
<p>As it should be.</p>
<p><em>Addendum: So grateful for the outpouring of support!  Please join <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/forum/boxes-and-arrows-contributers">this mailing list</a> where the next generation of B&amp;A begins to plan for the future&#8230;</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boxesandarrows.com/not-dead-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
