<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking with Virginia Postrel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/</link>
	<description>Boxes and Arrows is devoted to the practice, innovation, and discussion of design; including graphic design, interaction design, information architecture and the design of business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Pearce</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-9514</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-9514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The interview was an unexpected treat. I thought the book sounded kinda flimsy, but from reading her take what we do I was impressed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interview was an unexpected treat. I thought the book sounded kinda flimsy, but from reading her take what we do I was impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nova silverpill</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-9515</link>
		<dc:creator>nova silverpill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-9515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[shorter postrel: it&#039;s at target, so it&#039;s cool.

blah. pointless, self-important pointification from a self-described &quot;libertarian&quot; and, thusly, a natural born contrarian.

anyone who links so vociferously to Instapundit/idiot from her own blog invalidates whatever opinions she claims as her own.

at least reason.com is well designed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shorter postrel: it&#8217;s at target, so it&#8217;s cool.</p>
<p>blah. pointless, self-important pointification from a self-described &#8220;libertarian&#8221; and, thusly, a natural born contrarian.</p>
<p>anyone who links so vociferously to Instapundit/idiot from her own blog invalidates whatever opinions she claims as her own.</p>
<p>at least reason.com is well designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskeycricket</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5580</link>
		<dc:creator>whiskeycricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a &quot;growth in aesthetic value?&quot; What universe do you live in?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a &#8220;growth in aesthetic value?&#8221; What universe do you live in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarity</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5581</link>
		<dc:creator>clarity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Have nothing in your house that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.&quot; - william morris

As consumers of so much marketed to  so many, I believe we&#039;re seduced and deluded in ways we don&#039;t even recognize.  I question whether we&#039;re really more sophisticated consumers of &quot;aesthetics&quot; and &quot;smart design&quot;,  or just better-trained sheep.

I&#039;m all for //smart &amp; pretty// when it produces value; don&#039;t make me pay for &quot;pretty&quot; in my plumbing or circuitry.  Too much for too little. A little restraint, please.

P.S. - The Honeywell thermostat Postrel rails against in her Forbes FYI article was replaced by a new generation of &quot;easy-to-use&quot; devices. Or maybe not;  in Dec 2005, from the pulpit of his daily talk show, Regis Philbin screamed his frustration with his new Honeywell programmable thermostat....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have nothing in your house that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.&#8221; &#8211; william morris</p>
<p>As consumers of so much marketed to  so many, I believe we&#8217;re seduced and deluded in ways we don&#8217;t even recognize.  I question whether we&#8217;re really more sophisticated consumers of &#8220;aesthetics&#8221; and &#8220;smart design&#8221;,  or just better-trained sheep.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for //smart &amp; pretty// when it produces value; don&#8217;t make me pay for &#8220;pretty&#8221; in my plumbing or circuitry.  Too much for too little. A little restraint, please.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; The Honeywell thermostat Postrel rails against in her Forbes FYI article was replaced by a new generation of &#8220;easy-to-use&#8221; devices. Or maybe not;  in Dec 2005, from the pulpit of his daily talk show, Regis Philbin screamed his frustration with his new Honeywell programmable thermostat&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robdesign</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5582</link>
		<dc:creator>robdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I don&#039;t find this pointless at all.  From the aesthetic imperative to the switch from the knowledge worker to a model where most white-collar jobs are being outsourced to India and beyond, the idea that one need to know how and why to differentiate their product/design/site/whatever is very on target.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t find this pointless at all.  From the aesthetic imperative to the switch from the knowledge worker to a model where most white-collar jobs are being outsourced to India and beyond, the idea that one need to know how and why to differentiate their product/design/site/whatever is very on target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralphydumbo</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5583</link>
		<dc:creator>ralphydumbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well as my friend Ralph above so excellently proved, a level, a rarefied degree of mentality is needed for thi sort of discussion, which perhaps, our dear boy Ralph has not yet attained, and if not by now, probably won&#039;t in this lifetime. 

Aesthetic value isn&#039;t something that is exists in stasis. Knowledge grows from the beginning of our mind, to its end. A valuation of beauty, and lack thereof, must to be granted a life expectancy and a waxing and waning, a growth period. You can&#039;t simply adhere to one line of ability throughout years and years of practice, without some graduation of exponential increase in knowledge. And Appreciation is one form of knowledge, so yes, Aesthetic Value is something that most certainly can grow, brainiac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as my friend Ralph above so excellently proved, a level, a rarefied degree of mentality is needed for thi sort of discussion, which perhaps, our dear boy Ralph has not yet attained, and if not by now, probably won&#8217;t in this lifetime. </p>
<p>Aesthetic value isn&#8217;t something that is exists in stasis. Knowledge grows from the beginning of our mind, to its end. A valuation of beauty, and lack thereof, must to be granted a life expectancy and a waxing and waning, a growth period. You can&#8217;t simply adhere to one line of ability throughout years and years of practice, without some graduation of exponential increase in knowledge. And Appreciation is one form of knowledge, so yes, Aesthetic Value is something that most certainly can grow, brainiac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskeycricket</title>
		<link>http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5584</link>
		<dc:creator>whiskeycricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boxesandarrows.com/talking-with-virginia-postrel/#comment-5584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, Mr. Owl, I didn&#039;t say anything about it not being able to grow... I was commenting on Postrel&#039;s thesis, which jumps off from the point that our culture has a growing appreciation for Aesthetic Value.... which I think is ridiculous. Society is as tacky as ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Mr. Owl, I didn&#8217;t say anything about it not being able to grow&#8230; I was commenting on Postrel&#8217;s thesis, which jumps off from the point that our culture has a growing appreciation for Aesthetic Value&#8230;. which I think is ridiculous. Society is as tacky as ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
